The fate of Duralex and its 228 employees is about to be sealed in Loiret on July 26. This crucial date will decide the fate of the iconic French company, a symbol of know-how and tradition, as well as its precious employees. The stakes are high, and the future of this emblematic brand rests in the hands of decision-makers.
On July 26, the court will determine the future of Duralex, an emblematic company in Loiret, and its 228 employees. The suspense is at its peak as two recovery projects compete, each promising a different future for the company.
Two Proposed Projects
On one side, holding Tourres et Cie, led by Adrien Tourres, proposes to relaunch Duralex by leveraging synergies with La Rochère, another glassworks of the group. However, this project anticipates the elimination of 45 positions, which concerns unions and local officials.
On the other side is a cooperative (Scop) formed by Duralex employees. This project aims to preserve all jobs while reviving activity. It is supported by many local officials and already benefits from promises of funding.
Arguments and Controversies
Adrien Tourres highlights his strong financial capabilities and experience in the glass industry to justify the necessary job cuts for profitability. Union representatives like the CGT see it as a long-term vision, while hoping for adjustments to preserve more jobs.
In contrast, the Scop project faces criticism regarding its investment capabilities. Proponents of this project believe that the direct involvement of employees will lead to increased motivation and operational efficiency.
Political Support
Local officials, including the president of the Region and the mayor of Orléans, show almost total support for the Scop. They emphasize the immediate social and financial benefits, such as the elimination of property tax and the provision of public funding.
In contrast, some representatives of the CFDT point out the Tourres project for its deemed insufficient salary levels and doubts about the actual benefits generated for Duralex.
An Uncertain Future
The main debate revolves around the necessary investment to replace Duralex’s furnace, a key piece of equipment costing between 11 and 15 million euros. Both projects offer distinct solutions, but each carries considerable financial risks.
The court will make a decision based on the financial projections and the social impact of both proposals. Anxious employees await the verdict, which will determine if Duralex can maintain its historic production and in what form.
Key Differences Between the Projects
Here is an overview of the key elements distinguishing the two proposals:
| Tourres et Cie | Scop |
| Support from national banks | Support from local and regional officials |
| Reduction of 45 positions | Preservation of all jobs |
| Investments in synergy with La Rochère | Management by the employees themselves |
| Proposal for lower salaries | Exemption from property tax and reduced costs |
